WoWTCGdb

so which mage do you thinks is better for fire spec

Ta'Zo (Horde)

Ozzati (Alliance)

Firstly, Drainos suck and should all be eradicated.

Secondly, Ta'zo is better IMHO.
I have been main running a Ta'zo deck since the TCG started. He is the definition of a fire mage, He hits hard and shows no mercy.

The Draino is more for a means of wiping the board clean of lowbies, but I would rather focus fire on the opponents hero and then use my allies and AoEs to stop there allies from zerging or getting any where near Ta'zo.

 ~Zuty
 

id say

BAM WORLD IN FLAMES

AND THEN PYROBLAST!!!!!

 *maniacal laugh*

doesnt matter which hero you use!

that is the same way that i play my fire mage decks

as it goes for the fire spec mage i did play as ta'zo from the start but he could do the damage needed to kill off most heros so i'm using the new fire spec

i Like Ta'zo's ability because its a easy ally cleaner. Also nice to kill a hero with that ability as a finisher.

Ta'zo has better access to allies, IMHO.
Lots of big attack allies with Ferocity or large guys with Protector (The Guardian for instance). Since mages have low health and armor, but Pew Pew for high DPS you should have lots of protectors or ways to prevent/avoid the damage while Zerging and PewPewing on the side safely.

May I also be the first to add that UDE did a HORRIBLE job on making Berserking into a card. They keep it more to the Regeneration aspect of a Troll then the actual racial of Beserking. In the MMO it increases attack/casting speed, so it should reduce the cost of swing and playing class abilities depending on the damage on it, not increasing its AP.

~Zuty

Zuty:

Ta'zo has better access to allies, IMHO.
Lots of big attack allies with Ferocity or large guys with Protector (The Guardian for instance). Since mages have low health and armor, but Pew Pew for high DPS you should have lots of protectors or ways to prevent/avoid the damage while Zerging and PewPewing on the side safely.

Big attack allies with Ferocity...Oh, like Leeroy?  Large protectors hunh?  What about Crazy Igvand, Kulvo Jadefist or Donna Calister?  And even though he's not so big, you can't tell me Korthas Greybeard isn't awesome.  Parvink, though not all that special a protector, is still good for any deck.

Truth is there's a lot of good alliance allies out there.  I prefer to play Ozzati.  If I'm going Horde, I'll use Varanis, unless I'm making a Horde raid burn deck then it's Ta'zo all the way.

Don't take this as Alliance favoritism on my part...UDE is just following in Blizzard's footsteps.  Blizzard <3 Alliance.
 

Zuty:

May I also be the first to add that UDE did a HORRIBLE job on making Berserking into a card. They keep it more to the Regeneration aspect of a Troll then the actual racial of Beserking. In the MMO it increases attack/casting speed, so it should reduce the cost of swing and playing class abilities depending on the damage on it, not increasing its AP.

~Zuty

Yeah, Berserking sucks.  I guess they wanted as many people to play Troll in the TCG as in the MMO.

So far UDE is favoring Alliance. There are the few Horde cards that you point out, but overall, Alliance have better access to Allies, Quests, and Heros. I am not even going to name a few, but Alliance seem to have over heals on everything, I mean they even have an ally that auto heals all Allies in your party at end of turn. While Horde is of course more for attacking, but with low health and high costs for not much, Once again, Horde get the short end of the stick with WoW. If I had to guess, UDE spent more time playing Ally and the majority still do play Ally.

 GJ Blizz and GJ UDE for sucking even more Ally ***. Like I didn't get it enough in the MMO.

~Zuty
 

Well alliance has always been *** teaming up with eachother and then killing you in groups. I think they like group stuff. Maybe they all sleep in the same bed, have massive orgies and marry together! incest ftl!

i think eventually horde will get better :)

i guess ta'zo is better, since its more independable on abilities.